Tracking sediment, algae, and river recovery across 408 km — from the world's largest dam removal to the Pacific Ocean.
This project was delivered by Gybe to a large restauration company. Gybe's know-how and science team now operate as Aqualytics.
Four hydroelectric dams built between 1911 and 1962 had blocked salmon spawning grounds for over a century and caused chronic toxic algal blooms in their reservoirs. Following decades of advocacy by the Yurok and Karuk tribes, all four dams — J.C. Boyle, Copco No. 1, Copco No. 2, and Iron Gate — were breached in 2024 in the largest dam removal in history.
RES (Resource Environmental Solutions) needed to monitor the ecological consequences: the massive sediment loads released from behind the dams, the downstream propagation of turbidity slugs, and the longer-term recovery of water quality across the full lower basin — from the former Copco reservoir in California all the way to the Pacific Ocean.
Monitoring had to begin before drawdown to establish a meaningful baseline, and continue through stabilization to document river recovery. The Klamath is also culturally significant — healthy salmon runs are central to the way of life of the Yurok and Karuk peoples who led the restoration effort.
The dam breaches released decades of accumulated sediment in a matter of days. Standard monitoring tools weren't built for this.
Iron Gate — before, during, after. Sentinel-2 imagery: reservoir pre-removal (Dec 2023), peak sediment release (Feb 2024), free-flowing river (Feb 2025).
Post-removal turbidity spikes exceeded the detection limits of standard remote sensing algorithms — reaching over 1,400 FNU. Accurately measuring these extreme events required custom approaches developed specifically for the Klamath.
Snowmelt runoff, organic matter flushes, and storm runoff each produce distinct water types with different optical signatures. Meaningful comparison across seasons and events requires distinguishing these conditions from one another.
Monitoring 408 km of river requires a dense sampling network, which is hard to operate in remote, rugged terrain. On-the-ground sensor installations help capture transient events that pass between stations, but only really help when operated in conjunction with remotely sensed observations.
Demonstrating that dam removal improved the river requires knowing what "before" looked like — not just from sensors installed for the project, but from the full historical satellite record going back years.
The most consequential events — a major sediment flush, an algal bloom, a tributary input — are brief and spatially localized. Catching them required continuous monitoring across the entire basin at both high temporal and spatial resolution, something no ground-based sensor network could provide alone.
Monitoring commenced in October 2022 — before drawdown began — ensuring no part of the removal event would be missed and establishing a pre-removal baseline. Four hyperspectral sensors were installed at key locations along the river, co-located with USGS and Karuk Tribe gauging stations, providing continuous ground-truth data.
Sentinel-2 satellite data provided full basin coverage every five days, with a historical archive extending back to 2016. In July 2023, daily Planet Labs imagery was added — increasing spatial resolution from 10 m to 3 m and enabling monitoring of narrow tributaries and the estuary. Sensor and satellite data streams were fused continuously, producing water quality maps updated within 24 hours of each satellite overpass.
The Sentinel-2 archive from 2016 onward was processed before any dam was touched — establishing eight years of seasonal variability in turbidity and chlorophyll-a against which post-removal changes could be measured.
Four hyperspectral sensors delivered continuous near-real-time readings at critical points along the river. This ground-truth data was fused with satellite imagery to produce calibrated water quality maps across the entire basin — automatically, without manual intervention.
Monitoring extended beyond the river mouth into the Pacific Ocean, tracking sediment plumes as they entered coastal waters and dispersed in ocean currents — presenting a complete picture of the sediment budget from source to sea.
Sediment slugs released by the dam breaches were detected at their source and tracked downstream station by station — showing a 4× reduction in peak turbidity over the travel distance to the ocean (see sediment tracking example just below). By 2025, turbidity had returned to pre-removal baselines and extreme slugs were no longer detected.
The historical satellite archive revealed a second story: algal blooms in the former reservoir areas had been intensifying for eight years. Post-drawdown, blooms collapsed. Chlorophyll-a dropped sharply in all three former reservoir zones, and the summer 2024 bloom — an annual feature for years — did not materialize due to restored free-flowing river conditions.
Before-and-after satellite imagery makes the transformation visible to anyone: standing reservoir water replaced by a free-flowing river channel, sediment plumes propagating downstream and clearing within weeks.
In late February 2025, a major sediment flush originating at the former Iron Gate Reservoir was tracked continuously as it traveled 300 km downstream to the Pacific Ocean. Each sensor station recorded the slug's arrival and dissipation — revealing a 4× reduction in peak turbidity over the journey. By 2025, slugs of this intensity were no longer detected, marking the river's return to pre-removal conditions.
In situ turbidity measurements at five stations along the Klamath, Feb 27 – Mar 6 2025. The sediment slug peaked at 860 FNU at Iron Gate and dissipated to ~200 FNU by the time it reached Turwar at the river mouth.
The Klamath's water changes dramatically with the seasons and events: snowmelt produces turquoise clarity, organic flushes turn the water dark, storm runoff brings red-brown sediment loads. Each water type has a distinct optical signature visible from space — and each requires a different interpretation to measure accurately. These satellite snapshots show the Klamath mouth across five different conditions observed during the monitoring period.
Satellite imagery of the Klamath estuary across five observed water types. Accurately comparing these conditions requires detecting which water type is present before applying water quality algorithms.
"Dam removal is the best way to bring a river back to life. The Klamath is significant not only because it is the biggest dam removal and river restoration effort in history, but because it shows that we can right historic wrongs and make big, bold dreams a reality for our rivers and communities."
Dr. Ann Willis — California Director, American Rivers
The technology and expertise behind the Klamath project — satellite + sensor fusion, continuous automated processing, spatial water quality maps — is now available through Aqualytics. We work with restoration organizations, NGOs, government agencies, and water utilities to monitor rivers, lakes, and estuaries worldwide.
Whether you're monitoring a single restoration site or an entire watershed, we can help.
Get in touch